Change Prohibitors

By beyondtransparency

If you want to transform your organization, what do you feel will prohibit that change?

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “Change Prohibitors”

  1. Scott Wise Says:

    Change requires three things.

    1st there has to be a dissatisfaction with the status quo. Too often we begin to champion change in an organization, without really evaluating the satisfaction level of the stakeholders. Or alternatively there is a predominant delusion of satisfaction that is difficult to overcome, again requiring a careful evaluation of stakeholders.

    2nd there has to be a clear vision for the future change. No one is criticized for a bad vision, only for not having one. Especially when approaching cost management, we have to have a long term vision for how we are going to create an environment of accountability to control costs.

    3rd There has to be a roadmap or plan. Change doesn’t happen overnight and there has to be a plan to navigate the pitfalls over a longer period of time. At least with a clear vision and a road map an organization can avoid making wrong turns or detours from accomplishing the needed change.

  2. Chris Campbell Says:

    A quote from a recent Business Objects report states “Until six weeks ago, I would have said what kept me up at night was interacting with our external auditors to get compliant with Sarbanes-Oxley,” said a finance executive at a food-service conglomerate earlier this year. He calls the Sarbanes-Oxley work a “nightmare.”
    Is this compliance/controller role the chief competitor in finacnce that distracts it from strategy and moving it beyond transparency?

Leave a Reply